Last modified by sndueste on 2024/03/13 14:17
From version 17.1
edited by sndueste
on 2023/03/07 13:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 16.1
edited by sndueste
on 2023/03/02 14:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -142,22 +142,14 @@
142 142  
143 143  if the timing of the sender is not configured correctly it often occurs that the images are saved by one bunch ID "too late"  (-1 has to be substracted by the bunch ID of the camera). one can finetune the sending by optimizing the USR1 time.
144 144  
145 -Depending on the binning, bit depth, image size the correct USR1 setting may be different. but typically 40-80 is a good number
145 +Depending on the binning, bit depth, image size the correct USR1 setting may be different. but typically 80 is a good number
146 146  
147 147  [[image:attach:image2023-3-2_14-48-51.png||height="250"]]
148 148  
149 -one can check the mismatch easily by comparing the GMD and the integrated counts on the camera. here an example for USR1 time = 0. (for USR1 >= 20 the correlation is present without bunch ID shift )
150 -
151 -[[image:attach:image2023-3-7_13-49-59.png||thumbnail="true" height="250"]]
152 -
153 153  Here a report where the image saving in the DAQ is investigated in more detail:
154 154  
155 -{{view-file att--filename="Report-K.Kharitonov-05.09.2017.pdf" height="250"/}} and a more recent "studies"
151 +{{view-file att--filename="Report-K.Kharitonov-05.09.2017.pdf" height="250"/}}
156 156  
157 -{{view-file att--filename="statistic_2023_2.pdf" height="250"/}}
158 -
159 -{{view-file att--filename="Camera_bunchID_shift_V2023_3.pdf" height="250"/}}
160 -
161 161  \\
162 162  
163 163  == Installing new cameras ==