Collection of HDF5 sample data from different beamlines

• • how to find the public data in the gamma portal
  • How to look at the sample scripts ?
  • FL21
    • Data:   
    • analysis file :
    • description:
    • suggested reading:
  • FL24
    • Data:   
    • analysis file :
    • description:
    • suggested reading:
  • PG1
    • Data:
    • analysis file :
    • 
       Description:
    • suggested reading:
  • PG2 / HEXTOF
    • Data:
      • • analysis file:
        • analysis file:
    • 
       Description:
    • suggested reading:

how to find the public data in the gamma portal

How to look at the sample scripts ?

for some Beamlines implemented an online execution option for the sample scripts 

see the  Video how to use the tool 

and the link to the tool :  https://max-sas.desy.de/

FL21

Data:   

/asap3/flash/gpfs/fl21/2022/data/11015507/raw/hdf/offline/fl2user2//FLASH2_USER2_stream_2_run41519_file1_20211019T152756.1

analysis file :

/asap3/flash/gpfs/fl21/2022/data/11015507/processed/Example_analysis_THz_streaking_run41519.ipynb      

description:

Experiment: THz streaking
Beamline: FL21
Instrument: THz streaking 
Sample: Neon

The data was taken as part of the THz streaking photon diagnostic shifts. it contains GMD data and Time of Flight data ( recorded with the FLASH GHz ADCs) as well as beam arrival time (BAM) data.

we show how to read and interpolate the GMD data, look at the TOF data and sort a delay scan with the BAM

suggested reading:

R. Ivanov, I. Bermúdez Macias, J. Liu, G. Brenner, J. Roensch-Schulenburg, G. Kurdi, U. Fruehling, K, Wenig, S Walther, A Dimitriou, M Drescher, I P Sazhina, A K Kazansky, N M Kabachnik and S. Düsterer
Single-shot temporal characterization of XUV pulses with duration from ~10 fs to ~350 fs at FLASH
J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/ab9c38

Dennis Mayer, Fabiano Lever and Markus Gühr,   
Data analysis procedures for time-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy at a SASE free-electron-laser,
Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55, 054002 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/ac3c91

FL24

Data:   

/asap3/flash/gpfs/fl24/2023/data/11017906/raw/hdf/offline/fl2user1/

analysis file :

 asap3/flash/gpfs/fl24/2023/data/11017906/shared/data_loading.ipynb

and other python files in this folder

description:

Experiment: Photoelectron spectroscopy
Beamline: FL24
Instrument: URSAPQ
Sample:  ? 

suggested reading:

Jan Metje, Fabiano Lever, Dennis Mayer, Richard James Squibb, Matthew S. Robinson, Mario Niebuhr, Raimund Feifel, Stefan Düsterer, Markus Gühr,
URSA-PQ: A Mobile and Flexible Pump-Probe Instrument for Gas Phase Samples at the FLASH Free Electron Laser,
Appl. Sci. 10, 7882 (2020); http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10217882

PG1

Data:

/asap3/flash/gpfs/pg1/2023/data/11017909/raw/hdf/offline/fl1user3 

runs 43622 and 43624  (25 GB in total)

analysis file :

asap3/flash/gpfs/pg1/2023/data/11017909/processed/PG1_data_analysis_Si_example_FAB.ipynb  (version using the new FAB library) 

asap3/flash/gpfs/pg1/2023/data/11017909/processed/previous_analysis/PG1_data_analysis_Si_example.ipynb (version using the depreciated flashdaqhdfutils library ) 

 Description:

 Experiment: time-resolved RIXS
 Beamline: PG1
 Instrument: TRIXS end station
 Sample: Si

 Sample was pumped with an optical laser and probed via soft X-ray RIXS by
 varying the time delay between the optical laser and FEL.
 Time delay was changed repeatedly from 2935 ps to 2939 ps (these are the delay
 line encoder values of the optical laser ) in steps of 400fs, 1000 samples per
 delay step.

 RIXS images were collected via CCD camera (not full chip, only narrow region of
 interest), operated in long exposure mode of 5 sec (integrating several FEL
 trains per image).
 

suggested reading:

S. Dziarzhytski, M. Biednov, B. Dicke, A. Wang, P. S. Miedema, R. Y. Engel, J. O. Schunck, H. Redlin, H. Weigelt, F. Siewert, C. Behrens, M. Sinha, A. Schulte, B. Grimm-Lebsanft, S. G. Chiuzbăian, W. Wurth, M. Beye, M. Rübhausen, and G. Brenner,
The TRIXS end-station for femtosecond time-resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering experiments at the soft x-ray free-electron laser FLASH,
Struct. Dyn. 7, 054301 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/4.0000029

PG2 / HEXTOF

Data:

/asap3/flash/gpfs/pg2/2023/data/11019101/raw/hdf/offline/fl1user3/

Runs for standard example of hextof workflow (from Spin-Gd/W(110) beamtime, ID 11013410):

• 44762 - chessy sample for PEEM mode calibration
• 44797 - energy calibration
• 44798 and 44799 - optical spot profile with two different fluences
• 44824, 44825, 44826 and 44827 - trMM data

(3.5 GB in total)

analysis file:

/asap3/flash/gpfs/pg2/2023/data/11019101/processed/4_hextof_workflow.ipynb

Runs for example of BAM corrections (from H. Bentmann beamtime, ID 11013426):

• 44455 - energy calibration for W4f core level lines
• 44498 - trXPS dataset - t0 using side bands on W4f for BAM correction

(0.9 GB in total)

analysis file:

/asap3/flash/gpfs/pg2/2023/data/11019101/processed/hextof_workflow_bam_correction.ipynb - coming soon

 Description:

 Experiment: time-resolved momentum microscopy
 Beamline: PG2
 Instrument: HEXTOF
 Samples: Chessy and Gd/W(110)
 

Run 44762 was measured with a Hg lamp on the test "Chessy" sample to calibrate FoV in µm in the PEEM mode.

Runs 44798 and 44799 - optical spot profile measured in PEEM mode under the same settings as run 44762
with two different attenuations of the pump laser to determine the spot size of the pump laser.
This is needed to estimate pump fluence during trMM runs (44824, 44825, 44826 and 44827) using values
of I₀ monitor of the pump laser.

Runs 44797 - measured with 36.2 eV in k-mode with manually variable sample bias from 28 to 32V by 1 V 
every 2000 shots to calibrate the energy scale.
This energy calibration has to be used for trMM data.

Runs 44824, 44825, 44826 and 44827 were measured from Gd/W(110) sample which was pumped with
a 1030 nm s-polarized optical laser and probed with 36.2 eV for time-resolved momentum microscopy (trARPES)
varying the time delay between the optical laser and FEL. The time delay was changed in ZigZag manner repeatedly
from 1462.00 ps to 1464.85 ps with 200 steps and 1 sec waiting time at each step.

suggested reading:

1. D. Kutnyakhov, R.P. Xian, M. Dendzik, M. Heber, F. Pressacco, S.Y.  Agustsson, L. Wenthaus, H. Meyer, S. Gieschen, G. Mercurio, A. Benz, K. Bühlman, S. Däster, R. Gort, D. Curcio, K. Volckaert, M. Bianchi, Ch. Sanders, J A. Miwa, S. Ulstrup, A. Oelsner, C. Tusche, Y.-J. Chen, D. Vasilyev, K. Medjanik, G. Brenner, S. Dziarzhytski, H. Redlin, B. Manschwetus, S. Dong, J. Hauer, L. Rettig, F. Diekmann, K. Rossnagel, J. Demsar, H.-J. Elmers, Ph. Hofmann, R. Ernstorfer, G. Schönhense, Y. Acremann, and W. Wurth,
   Time- and momentum-resolved photoemission studies using time-of-flight momentum microscopy at a free-electron laser,
   Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 013109 (2020);
   https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118777
2. Single Event Data Frame Processor used as a backend to handle photoelectron resolved data streams
   https://github.com/OpenCOMPES/sed
3. Tutorial of typical data analysis workflow using sample data
   https://opencompes.github.io/sed/tutorial/4_hextof_workflow.html#